Uruguay Prevails over Argentina in International Court of Justice in Landmark Environmental Dispute
In Historic Internaional Environmental Case, ICJ Finds Argentina's Claims of Ecological Damage From Uruguay's Pulp Mill Unpersuasive, and Overwhelmingly Rejects Argentina's Request to Shut it Down
April 20, 2010
In a much-awaited ruling on a cross-border environmental dispute, the International Court of Justice in The Hague ruled overwhelmingly in Uruguay’s favor in a case brought by neighboring Argentina, which had attempted to force the closing and dismantling of a paper pulp mill on the Uruguay River, whose course forms part of the border between the two nations.
The ruling by 14 judges from around the world expressly upheld Uruguay’s right to continue operating the plant, finding that Argentina failed to prove that it discharged pollutants harmful to the river or its surroundings, or to the local flora and fauna.
Argentina brought the case to the ICJ, otherwise known as the World Court, in 2006. The two sides presented their final arguments last September. The case was only the second environmental dispute to be heard at the ICJ, and the first since the 1990s. The Court’s ruling was eagerly awaited by governments, international organizations, investors and environmental groups around the world.
Uruguay was successfully represented by Foley Hoag LLP, led by Washington, DC-based partner and international law specialist Paul Reichler, who practices frequently before the ICJ.
The Court’s judgment vindicated Uruguay’s assurances that, based on a comprehensive Environmental Impact Analysis and strict monitoring of the plant’s discharges, it was environmentally sound in all respects with no risk of harm to the river or its surroundings. The Court also relied on independent monitoring reports prepared by experts from the World Bank’s International Finance Corporation, which confirmed the clean operation of the plant, and the absence of any environmental harm.
Uruguay prides itself on its commitment to environmental protection, and considered the mill a model of “sustainable development” which produced significant economic benefits to the country without threatening the local ecology. Built by a Finnish firm for an estimated US $1.2 billion, the mill is the largest foreign investment in Uruguay’s history.
Mr. Reichler, Uruguay’s lead counsel, called the ruling a landmark decision confirming that “it is possible for a country to achieve its goal of sustainable economic development without compromising environmental protection.” The Court “performed a major service to the international community by setting the standards for determining when an industrial project may be considered free of risk to the environment.”
Mr. Reichler added, “This is a tribute to the extraordinary value of the ICJ as a vehicle for the peaceful and equitable resolution of disputes between States according to the rule of law.”
The Court found that, although Uruguay gave Argentina advance notice of its intention to authorize construction of the plant and an opportunity to consult about its environmental impact, it did not do so in the precise manner prescribed in a bilateral treaty between the two States. However, the Court rejected Argentina's claim that a technical procedural infraction of this nature justified shutting down a plant that caused no environmental harm.
Uruguay’s legal team was headed by its Agent, Ambassador Carlos Gianelli, who also serves as Uruguay’s Ambassador in Washington. In addition to Mr. Reichler, counsel for Uruguay included Foley Hoag partners Lawrence Martin, Adam Kahn, and Andrew Loewenstein, along with Professor Alan Boyle of the University of Edinburgh, a leading environmental lawyer; Professor Luigi Condorelli, a public international law expert from the European University of Florence; and Professor Stephen McCaffrey of the University of the Pacific Law School.
Argentina’s legal team included Professor Alain Pellet of the University of Paris; Professor Philippe Sands of University College London; Professor Marcelo Kohen of the Graduate Institute Geneva; and Professor Laurence Boisson de Chazournes of the University of Geneva.
About Foley Hoag LLP
Foley Hoag provides innovative, strategic legal services to public, private and government clients across the globe. We have premier capabilities in the life sciences, healthcare, technology, energy, professional services and private funds fields, and in cross-border disputes. The diverse backgrounds, perspectives and experiences of our lawyers and staff contribute to the exceptional service we deliver to clients ranging from startups to multinational companies to sovereign states. For more information, visit www.foleyhoag.com or follow @FoleyHoag on Twitter.