Foley Hoag LLP recently secured a victory on behalf of client Rhine-Tec GmbH (Rhine-Tec), following a jury trial on a breach of contract claim in Middlesex County Superior Court.
Rhine-Tec, a German manufacturer and seller of microscopes used by ophthalmologists, signed a contract in 2008 to sell substantially all of its assets related to two products to Hightech American Industrial Laboratories, Inc. (HAI), a Massachusetts-based manufacturer of ophthalmic equipment.
As part of the agreement, Rhine-Tec was required to transfer the assets to HAI within a five-month transition period. After HAI asserted that Rhine-Tec failed to transfer all of the assets and stopped making payments, the parties signed a series of amendments and agreed to a price reduction. Rhine-Tec completed all tasks in accordance with the amendments, but HAI refused to pay the balance of the contract price. HAI once again claimed that Rhine-Tec failed to complete the asset transfer.
In 2014, HAI sued Rhine-Tec for breach of contract and sought damages for its alleged manufacturing and parts costs, as well as lost profits. Rhine-Tec counterclaimed for HAI’s failure to pay the full contract price and sought multiple damages and attorneys’ fees under Massachusetts General Law Chapter 93A (c.93A).
After a four-day trial, a jury returned a verdict in favor of Rhine-Tec, finding that Rhine-Tec did not breach the parties’ agreement. The jury also found in favor of Rhine-Tec on its counterclaim, concluding that HAI had breached the agreement and was liable to Rhine-Tec for the full balance of the contract price. Rhine-Tec’s c.93A claim is still outstanding.
Foley Hoag attorneys Neil Austin and Michael Licker represented Rhine-Tec in the matter, with assistance from paralegal Judy Gallant.