June 25, 2016
As noted in the Foley Adviser dated April 14, 2016, there are several upcoming FATCA-related deadlines, two of which are right around the corner:
DUE DILIGENCE (FATCA) – JUNE 30, 2016
In general, all financial accounts (including interests in investment entities) that were maintained by non-U.S. investment entities as of June 30, 2014 have been classified as “pre-existing accounts” for U.S. and, where applicable, U.K. FATCA purposes. The due diligence requirements with respect to these pre-existing accounts have been phased-in since 2014. To the extent a non-U.S. investment entity has not completed its due diligence with respect to a pre-existing account, it generally must do so by June 30, 2016.
The only remaining exceptions to the due diligence requirement include:
In each of these cases, a pre-existing account will not become subject to FATCA until its value exceeds $1 million on a subsequent December 31st. At that time, a non-U.S. investment entity will be required to complete due diligence with respect to such account by June 30th of the following year.
Due diligence is the method by which a non-U.S. investment entity determines whether an account is a “Reportable Account” for U.S. or, where applicable, U.K. FATCA purposes. Typically, due diligence is undertaken by obtaining IRS Forms W-8 or W-9 from account holders (for U.S. FATCA purposes) and self-certifications of tax residency (for U.K. FATCA purposes), and then comparing such forms and self-certifications with other information obtained from account holders during the on-boarding process.
For financial accounts opened after June 30, 2014, due diligence generally must be completed within 90 days after on-boarding.
CAYMAN ISLANDS FATCA NOTIFICATION/REPORTING – AUGUST 10, 2016
The Cayman Islands recently announced extensions of certain 2016 FATCA compliance deadlines, as follows:
|Compliance Obligation||Old Deadline||Extended Deadline|
|Notification||June 10, 2016||August 10, 2016|
|Reporting (for 2015)||July 8, 2016||August 10, 2016|
Every Cayman Islands investment entity that is a “Reporting Financial Institution” under U.S. FATCA and/or U.K. FATCA (or its “sponsoring entity,” if applicable) generally is required to submit a notification to the Cayman Islands Tax Information Authority (TIA) with respect to the first year in which it is a “Reporting Financial Institution” under U.S. FATCA and U.K. FATCA.
The TIA has confirmed that a Reporting Financial Institution that has no “Reportable Accounts” still is required to submit a notification to the TIA, even if it opts to not file a “nil report.” Accordingly, every Reporting Financial Institution is subject to the notification requirements, whether or not it is required to file an annual report under U.S. or U.K. FATCA.
Furthermore, even if a Reporting Financial Institution submitted a notification to the TIA in 2015 for U.S. FATCA purposes, 2016 is the first reporting year under U.K. FATCA (with respect to 2014-15). Accordingly, such Reporting Financial Institutions should re-submit their respective notifications to the TIA, checking both U.S. and U.K FATCA, to ensure that they are compliant under both regimes.
A “sponsored entity” is not required to submit a notification in its own right; rather, its “sponsoring entity” submits the notification on behalf of the “sponsored entity.” For U.S. FATCA purposes, the “sponsoring entity” may be any entity, so long as it has registered with the IRS as a “sponsoring entity.” For U.K. FATCA purposes, however, the “sponsoring entity” must be a Cayman Islands Financial Institution. Investment advisers that have utilized a non-Cayman entity to act as a “sponsoring entity” for U.S. FATCA purposes may need to plan accordingly to identify a Cayman entity to act in that capacity for U.K. FATCA purposes. Cayman Islands investment entities that have been classified as “Reporting Cayman Islands Financial Institutions” for purposes of FATCA (or their “sponsoring entities,” if applicable) may notify the Cayman government of their respective reporting obligations and file reports, as applicable, by these extended deadlines without attracting adverse consequences or enforcement measures.